Making Empirical Observations
Ray Block, Jr.
PS #585
Research Methods
Today’s Blueprint
| Last Class: |
Today's Class: |
-
Measurement
-
Conceptualization and operationalization
-
Levels of measurement
-
Validity and reliability
|
-
Observations
-
What will you observe?
-
How will you observe it?
-
From what kind of population are you sampling?
-
How will you record your observations?
|
What Will You Observe?
Think: Problem selection
Ways of gaining knowledge:
-
Knowledge as Belief
-
Example: Religious faith
-
Knowledge as Authority
-
Given to you from your “superiors”
-
A Priori Knowledge
-
Does not depend on experience
-
Empirical Knowledge
-
Gained through human senses/experience
-
What is observation?
-
Gaining knowledge about the social world through human senses
-
Observation = Empirical knowledge
-
What purpose does it serve?
-
Observation = Necessary for measurement
-
Remember:
-
That which can be observed empirically can be measured scientifically
Social science is rooted in observation… In a sense, all social science
begins and ends with empirical observations.”
—Nachmias and Nachmias 1996, 206.
-
You cannot observe everything
-
What you observe is determined by what you are looking for
-
Previous research findings
-
Research question(s)
-
Hypotheses
-
What you observe = Unit of Analysis
How Will You Observe It?
Think: Data Collection
Ways of Observing
-
Direct Observation
-
Actually observing the behavior, attitudes, etc.
-
Indirect Observation
-
Observing only traces of the behavior, attitudes, etc.
Direct Observation Approaches
-
Participant Observation
-
4 “Perspectives” (by level of intrusiveness)
-
Complete Observer (Secret Outsider)
-
Participant as Observer (Recognized Outsider)
-
Observer as Participant (Marginal Participant)
-
Complete Participant (Full Participant)
Complete Observer (Secret Outsider)
-
Distant observer unknown to participants in natural setting
| Advantages :-) |
Disadvantages :-( |
-
Non-intrusive
-
First-hand observations
|
· Removed from the situation |
Participant as Observer (Recognized Outsider)
-
Firsthand observer made known to participants
| Advantages :-) |
Disadvantages :-( |
-
Closer to situation, yet still apart from it
|
-
Hawthorne Effect
-
Observer perceived as being “different"
|
Observer as Participant (Marginal Participant)
-
Adopt position of commonly accepted and unimportant participant
| Advantages :-) |
Disadvantages :-( |
-
Minimizes Hawthorne effect
-
Observer takes passive role in group
|
-
Group membership might bias data collection
|
Complete Participant (Full Participant)
-
Adopt position of central importance in situation
| Advantages :-) |
Disadvantages :-( |
|
|
-
Going “native”
-
Ability to unintentionally change others’ behavior
|
Indirect Observation Approaches
-
Case Studies
-
Interviews and Surveys
-
Document Analysis
-
Meta Studies
-
Physical Artifacts (erosion and accretion)
Case Studies:
-
Intense study of a single individual, institution, or situation
| Advantages :-) |
Disadvantages :-( |
-
Rich details
-
Directions for future research
|
-
Time-consuming
-
Little generalizability
-
No causal inference
-
Motivated forgetting
|
Surveys:
-
Obtaining a limited amount of information from a large number of people,
usually through random sampling
| Advantages :-) |
Disadvantages :-( |
-
Generalizability
-
Statistical power
-
Easier to code
|
-
Response bias (i.e. social desirability)
|
Interviews:
-
Obtaining large amounts of information from limited numbers of people,
usually through non-random sampling
| Advantages :-) |
Disadvantages :-( |
-
Detailed responses
-
Less response bias
|
-
Less statistical power
-
Harder to code
|
Document Analysis
-
Combing through pre-existing documents to understand social phenomena
| Advantages :-) |
Disadvantages :-( |
-
Completely non-intrusive
-
Researcher does not have to collect original data
|
-
Secondary, rather than primary, evidence·
-
Must gain access to documents
|
Physical Artifacts
-
Erosion Measures: The indirect observation of selective “wear and tear”
of some material
-
Accretion Measures: The indirect observation of the accumulation of materials
| Advantages :-) |
Disadvantages :-( |
|
|
-
Open to many (miss) interpretations
|
From What Kind of Population Are You Sampling?
Think: Sample Selection
Sampling techniques:
-
Random samples
-
Non-random samples
[Simple] Random Sample
-
Each item in the target population has an equal chance of appearing in
the sample
-
Samples are representative of population
| Advantages :-) |
Disadvantages :-( |
-
Can generalize beyond the sample
|
-
Difficult to obtain
-
Expensive to collect
|
Non-Random Sample
-
Each item in the target population does not have an equal chance of being
selected
-
Samples created using selection procedures
| Advantages :-) |
Disadvantages :-( |
-
Easier to obtain
-
Less expensive to collect
|
-
Cannot generalize beyond the sample
|
How Will You Record Your Observations?
Think: Coding and data entry
Types of records
-
Visual (Photographs, video tapes, etc.)
-
Audio (Taped conversations, speeches, etc.)
-
Written (Transcripts, summaries, etc.)
-
Digital (Computer disks, Internet, etc.)
How you record observations depends on:
-
Topic of interest
-
Ethical considerations
-
Access to resources
References (FYI):
-
Frankfort-Nachmias, Chava and David Nachmias. 1996. Research Methods in
the Social Sciences, 5th Edition. New York, NY: St. Martin Press.