Analyzing Records
Ray Block, Jr.
PS 585
Research Methods
Today’s Blueprint
Last Class:
-
Non-Experimental Research Designs
-
Experimental vs. non-experimental designs
-
Types of non-experimental designs
Today’s Class:
-
Analyzing Records:
-
What are records?
-
What types of records do researchers analyze
-
How do researchers analyze records?
What are Records?
Think: source(s) and content(s) of communication
What are Records?
-
Records = Communications
-
Records tell you about:
-
Sources of communication
-
Content of communication
The Source(s) of Communication:
-
How people/organizations communicate information
-
Defined broadly
-
Written records (transcripts, statistics, etc.)
-
Visual records (advertisements, pictures, etc.)
-
Audio records (speeches, music, etc.)
-
All of the above (videos, films, Internet, etc.)
-
Take home points:
-
Sources of communication are practically everywhere!!!
-
There are records of practically everything!!!
-
The sky’s the limit
The Content(s) of Communication:
-
What people/organizations communicate (The “message”)
-
What you get when you process records
-
Processed using qualitative or quantitative techniques
-
Caveat: This course will focus on the quantitative analysis of records
Types of Records
Think: running and episodic records
Types of Records
-
Two types:
-
Running records
-
Episodic records
1) Running Records: Records that are part of an on-going record-keeping
project
-
Advantages:
-
Cheaper
-
Accessible
-
Longitudinal data
-
Disadvantages:
-
No say-so in data collection
-
Limited access
-
Uncertain record keeping practices
2) Episodic Records: Records that are not part of an on-going record-keeping
project
-
Advantages:
-
Disadvantages:
-
Expensive/time consuming
-
Secondary sources
-
Limited access
-
Uncertain record keeping practices
Analyzing Records
Think: content analysis
-
What is content analysis? The practice of categorizing communication content
into certain themes based on certain rules
-
What purpose does it serve? Content analysis is codified common sense—a
set of procedures used to classify, summarize, and explain aspects of the
world
-
Uses of content analysis: Content analysis is very versatile:
-
Descriptive analysis
-
Theory-building
-
Testing hypotheses
1) Descriptive Analysis: Researchers can use content analysis for descriptive
purposes like:
-
Describing a particular message
-
Drawing conclusions about the content of a message based on these description
2) Theory Building: Researchers can use content analysis for theory-building
purposes like:
-
Answering research questions
-
Testing hypotheses
3) Testing Hypotheses: When testing hypotheses, researchers can use content
analysis in one of two ways:
-
To test relationships among variables within content analyze (content variables)
-
To test relationships among content variables and variables beyond the
analysis (non-content variables
-
The “centrality” of content (Riffe, Lacy, and Fico 1998):
-
Researchers can use content analysis to address research questions or test
hypotheses among content and non-content variables.
-
Most researchers do descriptive content analysis (no inferences)
-
Those who draw inferences from content seldom test relationships between
content variables
-
Those who test hypotheses seldom test relationships between content and
non-content variables
-
However:
-
We can use content analysis to test relationships between variables that
are internal and external to the analysis.
-
Therefore:
-
Content variables can serve as either the cause or the effect in your hypotheses
Recap:
-
Communication sources are practically everywhere
-
There are records of practically everything
-
You can make sense of these records with content analysis
-
Content analysis can apply to content both inside and outside the analysis
-
Content can be on both sides of the causal arrow
| Strengths |
Weaknesses |
-
Provides alternative when direct observation is not possible
-
Can gather data on a variety of topics
-
Unobtrusive
-
Non-reactive data
-
Low cost
-
Faithful record keeping allows for longitudinal analyses
|
-
Selective survival
-
Incomplete records
-
Limited access
-
Biased content
-
No standards for record keeping
-
Results are open to interpretation
-
Time/labor intensive
|
References (FYI):
-
Denzin, Norman and Yvonna S. Lincoln, eds. 2000. Handbook of Qualitative
Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
-
Riffe, Daniel, Steve Lacy, and Fred Fico. 1998. Analyzing Media Messages.
New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
-
Rodson, C. 2002. Real World Research (2nd ed.). Great Britain: Blackwell
Publishers.
-
Schwandt, Thomas. 2001. Dictionary of Qualitative Inquiry, 2nd Edition.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications